Yes, constraints are essential to enjoy freedom. Constraints are necessary to develop respect for views and beliefs of others. Absence of constraint would lead to imposition of beliefs and ideas of stronger groups eventually leading to conflict. Constraints are required to control violence and settle disputes.

Rights considered negative rights may include civil and political rights such as freedom of speech, life, private property, freedom from violent crime, freedom of religion, habeas corpus, a fair trial, and freedom from slavery.

In philosophy, liberty involves free will as contrasted with determinism. Thus liberty entails the responsible use of freedom under the rule of law without depriving anyone else of their freedom. Freedom is more broad in that it represents a total lack of restraint or the unrestrained ability to fulfill one’s desires.

Answer: Liberty and Equality are complementary to each other: As stated by Frances Wright, “Equality is the soul of liberty, there is, in fact, no liberty without it”. In a democracy, equality is often witnessed in liberty, hence it can be said that “liberty and equality complement” each other.

Freedom of expression refers to the ability of an individual or group of individuals to express their beliefs, thoughts, ideas, and emotions about different issues free from government censorship. The First Amendment assumes that the speaker, not the government, should decide the value of speech.

Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.

Freedom of expression is a core value in the democratic process. It ensures people are able to discuss, exchange, and debate ideas. This human right allows individuals and communities to find information which is important to them and share it with others, without censorship or reprisals.

Freedom of speech and expression, therefore, may not be recognized as being absolute, and common limitations or boundaries to freedom of speech relate to libel, slander, obscenity, pornography, sedition, incitement, fighting words, classified information, copyright violation, trade secrets, food labeling, non- …

No one enjoys being told what they can and cannot do. But we need some restrictions to protect the safety and honor of the American people. There comes a time when the priority should be the safety of the citizens and if that means having to limit our freedom of speech, then so be it. Speech is no exception.

It would only require the adjudicative body to weigh the individual’s interest in the freedom of expression against the interests of others in public order; a restriction on such criticism could conceivably be justified if the court or tribunal decided that the competing interests outweighed the interest in the freedom …

No:- In this modern world, freedom of speech helps develop personal and life skills for any individual. Participating in discussions and expressing your own opinion makes one expressive about their thoughts. Such people can easily put forward their point can convince people very easily and take good decisions in life.

So, as a government employee you can’t say whatever you want on social media and expect to be protected by the First Amendment. Public agencies and employees must be aware of the contours of the freedom of speech as applied to public employees.