The purpose of a marriage in those days was to produce children – sons, most preferably – and until Roxane gave birth Alexander would have kept her with him. Imagine if he had sent her away without a child! It would have been perceived as a great insult by both her family and the Bactrian/Sogdians.

2. In 15 years of conquest Alexander never lost a battle. After securing his kingdom in Greece, in 334 B.C. Alexander crossed into Asia (present-day Turkey) where he won a series of battles with the Persians under Darius III.

*Alexander’s physical description is variously reported as of him having curly, dark blonde hair, a prominent forehead, a short, jutting chin, fair to reddish skin, an intense gaze, and a short, stocky, tough figure. It has been commented upon more than once that Alexander had one dark brown eye and one blue eye!

The ancient Greeks and Macedonians were xenophobes and an outsider was unlikely to have risen to such a position of trust and importance. he was simply called Cleitus the Black to differentiate him from Cleitus the White.

No, he wasn’t. He was ethnically Greek, and Greek people are not Caucasian. If you’re asking if he was white, then yes he was white, specifically Macedonian aka kinda Greek and the Greeks and Macedonians were in fact Caucasian or white.

apart from literary sources there is no archaeological evidence present that proves his existence ,but you can understand it as he was king very long ago. Originally Answered: Is there any concrete proof of Alexander the great? YES he did exist and he was a great warrior on his way to conquering India. He died at 32.

Malayketu

Alexander the Great was defeated by King Porus in India. Several conquerors at the time had fallen at the gates (Punjab) of India and Alexander was one of them.

Chandragupta Maurya