His opponent, Zachary Taylor, ignored the issue of slavery altogether in his campaign, and won the election of 1848. As the 1840s melted into the 1850s, Stephen Douglas became the loudest proponent of popular sovereignty.

Popular sovereignty in its modern sense is an idea that dates to the social contracts school (mid-17th to mid-18th centuries), represented by Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679), John Locke (1632–1704), and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778), author of The Social Contract, a prominent political work that clearly highlighted the …

Explain why popular sovereignty was controversial. It was controversial because the Southerners wanted the new states to be slave states and the Northerners wanted the new states to be fee states. The act divided the territory into 2 states. Missouri was in the North and Kansas was to be in the South.

Popular sovereignty was asserted as a founding principle of the United States of America. Popular sovereignty was also included in Article V of the Constitution, which provides the means to amend the Constitution through the elected representatives of the people.

The Kansas-Nebraska Act was an 1854 bill that mandated “popular sovereignty”-allowing settlers of a territory to decide whether slavery would be allowed within a new state’s borders. The southerners believed that the “newcomers” had no right to decide on the slave issue in Kansas.

A moderate, who introduced the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854 and popularized the idea of popular sovereignty. The doctrine that stated that the people of a territory had the right to decide their own laws by voting. In the Kansas-Nebraska Act, this would decide whether a territory allowed slavery.

In the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, popular sovereignty allowed the citizens to decide if slavery was allowed or not.

Probably the most important result of the Kansas-Nebraska Act was its language concerning the contentious issue of slavery. This stipulation repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820 which stated that slavery was prohibited north of 36° 30′.

In 1854, Congress passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which organized the remaining territory acquired in the Louisiana Purchase so that such territories could be admitted to the Union as states. Probably the most important result of the Kansas-Nebraska Act was its language concerning the contentious issue of slavery.

It became law on May 30, 1854. The Kansas-Nebraska Act repealed the Missouri Compromise, created two new territories, and allowed for popular sovereignty. It also produced a violent uprising known as “Bleeding Kansas,” as proslavery and antislavery activists flooded into the territories to sway the vote.

The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 created the territories of Kansas and Nebraska, opening new lands for settlement, and had the effect of repealing the Missouri Compromise of 1820 by allowing white male settlers in those territories to determine through popular sovereignty whether they would allow slavery.

Kansas-Nebraska territory=slavery decided by popular sovereignty. Effect: Led to Bleeding Kansas. Cause: Kansas-Nebraska territory would vote if there was going to be slavery. Effect: There was violence because people snuck into Kansas to vote for slavery.

The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed each territory to decide the issue of slavery on the basis of popular sovereignty. In 1854, Congress passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which organized the remaining territory acquired in the Louisiana Purchase so that such territories could be admitted to the Union as states.