HEBREW PROPHETS AND PROPHECY. 2. The prophets of Judah from the overthrow of Israel to the final over- throw of Judah and Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar, B. C. 586. This list includes Isaiah, Micah, Nahum, Obadiah, Jeremiah, Habakkuk and Zephaniah.

As the anointed representative of the Lord, the Judean king was seen by Old Testament writers as a mediator of the covenant between the Lord and his people. This covenant, however, was made with David as “ruler over my people Israel” (2 Samuel 7:8). …

In the First Book of Samuel in the Old Testament the tribal elder and seer Samuel is asked by the people to appoint a King over them so they can be like other nations – “That we also may be like all the nations; and that our king may judge us, and go out before us, and fight our battles.”.

Samuel

Jehoash

Manasseh

They used these variations to create a more reliable molecular clock and found that Adam lived between 120,000 and 156,000 years ago. A comparable analysis of the same men’s mtDNA sequences suggested that Eve lived between 99,000 and 148,000 years ago1.

Onan

A cosmological argument, in natural theology, is an argument which claims that the existence of God can be inferred from facts concerning causation, explanation, change, motion, contingency, dependency, or finitude with respect to the universe or some totality of objects.

One of the most fascinating arguments for the existence of an all-perfect God is the ontological argument. While there are several different versions of the argument, all purport to show that it is self-contradictory to deny that there exists a greatest possible being.

In Aquinas’s system, God is that paramount perfection. Aquinas’s fifth and final way to demonstrate God’s existence is an argument from final causes, or ends, in nature (see teleology). Again, he drew upon Aristotle, who held that each thing has its own natural purpose or end.

The first cause argument is based around cause and effect. The idea is that everything that exists has something that caused it, there is nothing in our world that came from nothing. As human beings we are used to seeing cause and effect in our everyday lives, so this argument is easy to relate to.

This is an argument for the existence of God. It points to evidence that suggests our world works well – ie that it was designed in a specific way. The argument follows that if it was designed like this, then someone or something must have designed it.

William Paley (1743 – 1805) argued that the complexity of the world suggests there is a purpose to it. This suggests there must be a designer, which he said is God.

The basic premise, of all teleological arguments for the existence of God, is that the world exhibits an intelligent purpose based on experience from nature such as its order, unity, coherency, design and complexity.

The Fine-Tuning Argument, to be abbreviated by FTA in what follows, claims that the present Universe (including the laws that govern it and the initial conditions from which it has evolved) permits life only because these laws and conditions take a very special form, small changes in which would make life impossible.

You’ll measure something that will confuse you in one of two ways: either two things that appear unrelated are perfectly (or almost perfectly) identical, or two things that appear related are extraordinarily different. This is known as fine-tuning, and it really is a problem in physics.

Why fine-tuning deep learning model is necessary Whenever we are given the task of training a deep learning neural network, we usually think of training it from scratch. With fine-tuning, the deep learning neural networks already have most of the data available for the new model from previous ones.

Philosophical debates in which “fine-tuning” appears are often about the universe’s fine-tuning for life: according to many physicists, the fact that the universe is able to support life depends delicately on various of its fundamental characteristics, notably on the form of the laws of nature, on the values of some …