Explanation: A scientific claim is the scientific data that is appropriate and the enough to support the claim. Thus, we can conclude that controlled experiments serves as evidence for a scientific claim.

Formulating a New Hypothesis If your hypothesis is supported, you might think of ways to refine your hypothesis and test those. Either way, the process of experimentation often leads to whole new questions to explore. The possibilities are infinite, and the search for knowledge is never-ending.

Which statement correctly compares a law and a theory? Both a law and a theory can be tested. Which is least likely to occur after an experiment is conducted to test a hypothesis? The hypothesis becomes a theory if the results support it.

Make sure your hypothesis is “testable.” To prove or disprove your hypothesis, you need to be able to do an experiment and take measurements or make observations to see how two things (your variables) are related. You should also be able to repeat your experiment over and over again, if necessary.

A hypothesis or model is called falsifiable if it is possible to conceive of an experimental observation that disproves the idea in question. Scientists all too often generate hypotheses that cannot be tested by experiments whose results have the potential to show that the idea is false.

A hypothesis must also be falsifiable. That is, there must be a possible negative answer. For example, if I hypothesize that all green apples are sour, tasting one that is sweet will falsify the hypothesis.

This is the Difference Between a Hypothesis and a Theory. In scientific reasoning, a hypothesis is an assumption made before any research has been completed for the sake of testing. A theory on the other hand is a principle set to explain phenomena already supported by data.

A hypothesis is an educated guess or prediction about the relationship between two variables. But, because theory is a result of scientifically rigorous research, it is more likely that the theory is true (as compared to a single hypothesis).

What’s the difference between a hypothesis and a theory? “Theory is another word for “fact”; hypothesis is another word for “guess”. Theories have been confirmed through tests; hypotheses haven’t. Theories contain many hypothesis; a hypothesis only contains one theory.

You can, and, if you become a scientist, you should disprove a hypothesis or even theory. Because they can be. You cannot however PROVE either of them. Every theory and hypothesis is simply “not disproven” There is no such thing as a proven anything in science.

When a scientific hypothesis has been tested over and over again and has not been contradicted, it may become known as a law or principle. A scientific fact, on the other hand, is generally something that competent observers can observe and agree to be true. A theory is a synthesis of facts and well-tested hypotheses.

A good hypothesis relates an independent variable and a dependent variable. While you could consider any prediction of an outcome to be a type of hypothesis, a good hypothesis is one you can test using the scientific method. In other words, you want to propose a hypothesis to use as the basis for an experiment.

Expert Answers A hypothesis is a proposed idea that may explain an observation or phenomena. It is verified by testing it. If the data supports the hypothesis, then we consider the hypothesis to be verified and true.

If the data consistently do not support the hypothesis, then CLEARLY, the hypothesis is NOT a reasonable explanation of what you are investigating. The hypothesis is rejected, and we search for a new interpretation, an new hypothesis that supports the experimental data.

Upon analysis of the results, a hypothesis can be rejected or modified, but it can never be proven to be correct 100 percent of the time. For example, relativity has been tested many times, so it is generally accepted as true, but there could be an instance, which has not been encountered, where it is not true.

In the discussion section, the past tense is generally used to summarize the findings. But when you are interpreting the results or describing the significance of the findings, the present tense should be used.

Past Tense Regular Verbs To change a regular verb into its past tense form, we normally add –ED to the end of the verb. There are some exceptions with a slight change in spelling which you can see here: Spelling of words ending in ED.

WRITING THE RESEARCH PROPOSAL. Use Future Tense: A research proposal is an outline of your proposed research which you will undertake in future. Hence, use future tense for the actions being done in the research e.g. A survey method will be employed in the research.

The verb have has the forms: have, has, having, had. The base form of the verb is have. The present participle is having. The past tense and past participle form is had….Have – Easy Learning Grammar.

“Had been” is used to mean that something happened in the past and has already ended. “Have been” and “has been” are used to mean that something began in the past and has lasted into the present time.

They’re both compound, and they often imply connection between an event and a point of reference. When you say “have just” it implies that the event in reference affects the present state. “Had just” works in much the same way, but because the past is somewhat broad, it can cover a large, more convoluted period.

Had had is the past perfect form of have when it is used as a main verb to describe our experiences and actions. We use the past perfect when we are talking about the past and want to refer back to an earlier past time, Madiini.

Synonyms & Antonyms of had

• commanded,
• enjoyed,
• held,
• owned,
• possessed,
• retained.

‘I had had my breakfast. ‘ – past perfect tense as in ‘I had eaten my breakfast. ‘ Here, the fist part of the verb phrases have/has and had are auxiliary and the second part had is the past participle form of the main verb have.

is correct. Present perfect tense is used, because the actions related to your application (review and decision) are in the present time frame. Past perfect would be correct if those actions were completed: I had submitted the application, but the position was already filled.

Had sentence example

• They had two adopted children already.
• Certainly she had been under a lot of stress.
• A nearby steeple had been broken off short and the fragments lay heaped beside it.
• All the papers had been signed and the money provided.
• Would she ever outgrow the things mama had taught her?

“Have had” is using the verb have in the present perfect tense. Consider the present tense sentence: I have a lot of homework. This means that I have a lot of homework now. On the other hand, we use the present perfect tense to describe an event from the past that has some connection to the present.