Stranger and ajnabi are not the meaning of the words foreigner in the past. Explanation: Stranger means a person whom we do not know.

Who was considered a “foreigner” in the past? Answer: According to the medieval period, any stranger who did not belong to a certain society or culture and was not a part of that particular village was regarded as a foreigner.

Who was considered a “foreigner” in the past? Answer: Any stranger who did not belong to a certain society or culture and was not a part of that particular village was regarded as a foreigner.

In the medieval period, a ”foreigner” was an stranger who was not a part of society or culture. for example, a forest-dweller was a foreigner to a city-dweller. 2. But two peasants living in the same village were not foreigners to each other, even though they may have had different religious or caste backgrounds.

The foreigner was a tourist in india. He was rich American buisnessman who dealt in coffee. He was polite and courteous as he offered Muni a cigarette and though he did not understood Muni,he listened to him attentively.

Answer. Explanation: Stranger and ajnabi are not the meaning of the words foreigner in the past. Explanation: Stranger means a person whom we do not know.

Historians divide the past into periods based on the economic and social factors which characterize them. In doing so they are faced with two problems. First, economic and social changes keep taking place hence definite boundaries cannot be drawn. Second, these periods are compared with modernity.

At that time a person who does not belongs to a society or culture where considered as term [ Pardesi ]. In now times, people which belongs to another country are called term [ Foreigner ]. In the medieval period a stranger is often called a foreinger who is someone from outside the city.

Some of the major significant religious developments occurred in Hinduism. The worship of new deities, the construction of temples by royalty and the growing importance of Brahmanas, the priests, as dominant groups in society were the new changes.

The period between 700 and 1750 witnessed major changes in religion. It was seen prominently in Hinduism. The worship of new deities, the construction of temples by royalty and the growing importance of Brahmanas, the priests, as dominant groups in society were some of the major developments.

5. How did the Rashtrakutas become powerful? Answer: The Rashtrakutas in the Deccan were the subordinate to the Chalukyas of Karnataka. It was during the mid-8th century when Dantidurga, a Rashtrakuta chief, overthrew his Chalukya overlord and performed a ritual called ‘Hiranya-garbha’ with the help of Brahmanas.

Answer: In the thirteenth century the term “Hindustan” meant the areas of Punjab, Haryana and the lands between the Ganga and Yamuna. While the idea of a geographical and cultural entity like ‘India’ did exist, the term “Hindustan” did not carry the political and national meanings which we associate with it today.

poet Amir Khusrau

pronunciation (help·info)), along with its shortened form Hind (هند), are the Persian names for India, broadly the Indian subcontinent, which later became used by its inhabitants in Hindi–Urdu (Hindustani). A secondary meaning of Hindustan is as a geographic term for the Indo-Gangetic Plain in northern India.

Minhaj-i Siraj

Jambudvipa (Sanskrit: जम्बुद्वीप Jambu-dvīpa, lit. “berry island”) was used in ancient scriptures as a name of India before Bhārata became the official name. The derivative Jambu Dwipa was the historical term for India in many Southeast Asian countries before the introduction of the English word “India”.

Minhaj-i-Siraj

Sindh: It is a southeastern state of Pakistan with its capital in Karachi. Hind: This name also comes from the Sanskrit word Sindhu. Sindh which is currently the province of Pakistan is a piece of land adjacent to Indus River and the Thar Desert.

The term ‘Hindustan’ was used for the first time by Minhaj-i Siraj, a thirteenth-century Persian chronicler. He, with this term, meant the areas of Punjab, Haryana and the lands between the Ganga and Yamuna. It was used in a political sense for lands constituting a part of the dominions of the Delhi Sultan.

The term ‘foreigner’ is used in the sense of a person who is not an Indian. In the medieval period it was applied to any stranger who appeared, say in a given village, someone who was not a part of that society or culture. In this sense a forest-dweller was a foreigner for a city-dweller.