The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed each territory to decide the issue of slavery on the basis of popular sovereignty. Kansas with slavery would violate the Missouri Compromise, which had kept the Union from falling apart for the last thirty-four years. The long-standing compromise would have to be repealed.

What did the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act have in common? They both insisted on the removal of slavery in the territories. They were both a compromise on the issue of slavery in the territories. They both had large support from the North and the South.

Missouri Compromise: Primary Documents in American History Enacted in 1820 to maintain the balance of power in Congress, the Missouri Compromise admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state.

Kansas-Nebraska territory=slavery decided by popular sovereignty. Effect: Led to Bleeding Kansas. Cause: Kansas-Nebraska territory would vote if there was going to be slavery. Effect: There was violence because people snuck into Kansas to vote for slavery.

Terms in this set (4) Which was a direct result of the Kansas-Nebraska Act? The Act led to violence in Kansas as pro- and anti-slavery forces fought. It gave slave owners the right to recapture their runaway slaves.

In 1854, Congress passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which organized the remaining territory acquired in the Louisiana Purchase so that such territories could be admitted to the Union as states. Probably the most important result of the Kansas-Nebraska Act was its language concerning the contentious issue of slavery.

It became law on May 30, 1854. The Kansas-Nebraska Act repealed the Missouri Compromise, created two new territories, and allowed for popular sovereignty. It also produced a violent uprising known as “Bleeding Kansas,” as proslavery and antislavery activists flooded into the territories to sway the vote.

Which of the following was a result of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854? Fighting broke out between pro-slavery and anti-slavery groups in Kansas. Kansas entered the Union as a slave state through popular sovereignty in 1856.

What was the main purpose of the Kansas-Nebraska Act? The Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed by the U.S. Congress on May 30, 1854. It allowed people in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide for themselves whether or not to allow slavery within their borders.

The years of 1854-1861 were a turbulent time in the Kansas Territory. In Kansas, people on all sides of this controversial issue flooded the territory, trying to influence the vote in their favor. Rival territorial governments, election fraud, and squabbles over land claims all contributed to the violence of this era.

Why did some Northerners in Congress disapprove of the Kansas-Nebraska Act? It could allow slavery to exist in Northern territories. the people in each territory would vote on whether they wanted to allow slavery or not.

Why did most Northerners and Southerners disagree about the Kansas-Nebraska Act? Northerners and Southerners disagreed about the Kansas Nebraska act because the law Theyestablished the territories of Kansas and Nebraska and gave the residents the right to decide whether to allow slavery.

Why did Southerners support the Kansas-Nebraska Act? The Popular Sovereignty clause in the Act meant the territories might allow slavery and enter the Union as slave states. By allowing the territories to use popular sovereignty to decide the slavery issue, the Missouri Compromise was ended.

Q. What led newspapers to speak of “Bleeding Kansas” in 1856? Fighting between pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces. It called for popular sovereignty to decide on slavery in territories.

The event that led directly to the secession of Southern States was the election of Abraham Lincoln as president . Secession is the separation from a group this was typical eno during the separation of the southern States from the union .

which event was catalyst for the secession of the first seven southern states in 1861? the election of Abraham Lincoln as president.

Senator Jefferson Davis

No, the southern states had no legal right to secede from the Union. There was no right to secede under the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, and there continued to be none in the more perfect union ordained and established by the People of the United States in the Constitution.