Thoreau wrote “Civil Disobedience” to express his discontent about the government control over its citizens. In the essay, Throreau argues that people should be allowed to act according to their believes, rather than be obliged to follow laws dictated by the mayority.

One of the most significant and tangible effects India has had on life in the United States was Mahatma Gandhi’s influence on the Civil Rights leader, Martin Luther King, who adapted Gandhi’s idea of civil disobedience to the civil rights movement in the United States.

Both felt that people have the moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. Based on “Civil Disobedience,” what statement did Thoreau, like his modern-day successors, hope to make with his imprisonment? He wanted to suggest that one should be willing to go to great lengths for a belief.

Thoreau argues that there are two laws: the laws of men and the higher laws of God and humanity. If the laws of men are unjust, then one has every right to disobey them.

In his essay, “Resistance to Civil Government,” often times dubbed, “Civil Disobedience,” Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862) argues against abiding to one’s State, in protest to the unjust laws within its government.

The three basic ideas (Experience, Self-reliance, and Worship) in Thoreau’s Walden deals specifically with one theme: “Simplicity”. To Thoreau, simplicity in experience, simplicity in self-reliance, and simplicity in worship breeds the finer things in life.

The correct answer for this question is this one: “It fortified the beliefs of those who thought the government acted unfairly.” The statement that best describes one way in which “Civil Disobedience” that impacted people and events later in history is that it helps fortify the beliefs of those people that they thought …