The difference between the Articles of Confederation and Constitution is that the Articles of Confederation are the rules that were agreed by the United States of America in the 18th century whereas the constitution is the rules that democratic countries and other legalized institutions develop to implement law and …

Terms in this set (9)

• make war and peace.
• send and receive ambassadors.
• make treaties.
• borrow money.
• set up a money system.
• establish post offices.
• build a navy.
• raise an army by asking for troops.

Section 9. Powers Denied to Congress

• Clause 1. Importation of Slaves. In General.
• Clause 2. Habeas Corpus Suspension.
• Clause 3. Bills of Attainder and Ex Post Facto Laws.
• Clause 4. Taxes.
• Clause 5. Duties On Exports From States.
• Clause 6. Preference to Ports.
• Clause 7. Appropriations and Accounting of Public Money.
• Clause 8. Titles of Nobility; Presents.

So, simply put, an act is the formally codified result of deliberation by a legislative body. An article is a separate and distinct part of a written instrument, such as a contract, statute, or constitution, that is often divided into sections.

The Federalist Party was the first political party in the United States. The Federalists called for a strong national government that promoted economic growth and fostered friendly relationships with Great Britain in opposition to Revolutionary France.

Although the primary purpose of The Federalist was to convince New Yorkers to send to the Constitutional Convention delegates who would vote to ratify the Constitution, fully two-thirds of New York’s delegates initially opposed ratification.

The anti-Federalists and their opposition to ratifying the Constitution were a powerful force in the origin of the Bill of Rights to protect Amercians’ civil liberties. The anti-Federalists were chiefly concerned with too much power invested in the national government at the expense of states.

Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.

A) The Constitution created a stronger federal government. The Constitution protected individual rights through the Bill of Rights. …

Those who supported the Constitution and a stronger national republic were known as Federalists. Those who opposed the ratification of the Constitution in favor of small localized government were known as Anti-Federalists. The Anti-Federalists argued against the expansion of national power.

Federalists believed in a strong federal republican government led by learned, public-spirited men of property. The Democratic-Republicans, alternatively, feared too much federal government power and focused more on the rural areas of the country, which they thought were underrepresented and underserved.

The Democratic-Republicans comprised diverse elements that emphasized local and humanitarian concerns, states’ rights, agrarian interests, and democratic procedures. During Jackson’s presidency (1829–37) they dropped the Republican label and called themselves simply Democrats or Jacksonian Democrats.

So let’s recap – the Federalists vs. the Democratic-Republicans. Hamilton and the Federalists wanted a strong central government, run by well-educated property owners. Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans wanted most power to stay with the states and wanted the farmers and the ‘common man’ to run the nation.

Alexander Hamilton