This law Page 2 also gave the British troops the writs of assistance- allowed British soldiers to search any colonists home at any time. Patriots: Upset the British taxed them again. Also very upset the British soldiers were patrolling their colonies.

The colonists were concerned and openly opposed the writs of assistance because they believed that the instrument infringed on their rights. The writs were permanent, transferable and the officials were not liable for any damages during the search.

In general, customs writs of assistance served as general search warrants that did not expire, allowing customs officials to search anywhere for smuggled goods without having to obtain a specific warrant.

Cause: These acts placed duties on glass, lead, paints, paper, and tea. To enforce this, British officials used writs of assistance. These allowed tax collectors to search for smuggled goods. Effect: Colonists hated the new laws because they took power away from colonial government.

Cause: the Intolerable Acts, the Boston Tea Party, which allowed British troops to house in the colonies, and the Americans were responsible for feeding and creating a hospitable environment. Effect: this angered the colonists, not only did they have to pay more, but it also caused the Stamp Act.

As a result of the Intolerable Acts, even more colonists turned against British rule. Great Britain hoped that the Intolerable Acts would isolate radicals in Massachusetts and cause American colonists to concede the authority of Parliament over their elected assemblies.

The four acts were (1) the Boston Port Bill, which closed Boston Harbor; (2) the Massachusetts Government Act, which replaced the elective local government with an appointive one and increased the powers of the military governor; (3) the Administration of Justice Act, which allowed British officials charged with …

The Government Act abolished representative government by establishing an all-powerful governor, and the Justice Act removed the right to a fair trial. The Quartering Act insured the close proximity of British troops to the colonists.

The main goal of the sugar act was to increase revenue because of the debt formed during the Great War for Empire. The British were hoping to make 100,000, which is still only 1/5 of the money spent during the war.

The parliament passed the sugar act to stop smuggling between colonies and the French west indies. The sugar act lowered the tax on molasses imported by colonists. The sugar act established special courts to hear smuggling cases. This included a judge appointed by the British court and no juries.

Americans protested the Sugar Act primarily because of its economic impact, but for some “no taxation without representation” became a rallying cry against Parliament’s right to tax the colonies.

The American colonists protested the act, claiming that the British West Indies alone could not produce enough molasses to meet the colonies’ needs. The act was later amended by the Sugar Act of 1764, which became an irritant contributing to the American Revolution.

In response to the Sugar, Act colonists formed an organized boycott of luxury goods imported from Great Britain. 50 merchants from throughout the colonies agreed to boycott specific items and began a philosophy of self-sufficiency where they produce those products themselves, especially fabric-based products.

By the 1770s, many colonists were angry because they did not have self-government. This meant that they could not govern themselves and make their own laws. They had to pay high taxes to the king. They were also angry because the colonists were forced to let British soldiers sleep and eat in their homes.