Cards

For best results enter two or more search terms….psychology.

One of the most influential schools of thought within psychology’s history was behaviorism. Behaviorism focused on making psychology an objective science by studying overt behavior and deemphasizing the importance of unobservable mental processes.

Behaviorism was based on the belief that psychology would advance as a science only if it turned away from the study of mental processes and limited itself to the study of observable behaviors that could be recorded and measured.

Cognitive perspective explains human learning, thinking, and behaving from information processing approach where all the information is attended sensed, perceived, interpreted, and response is made. Repeated exposure to the information leads to the consolidation of memory which is long lasting.

The Levels of Analysis, often abbreviated to LOA, are the various ways of observation in psychology. The three LOAs are biological, cognitive, and sociocultural. Biological is observing the physical aspects of the brain, such as physiology and chemicals.

micro level

Sociological research can occur at any of the following three analytical levels: micro, meso, or macro. Some topics lend themselves to one particular analytical level while others could be studied from any, or all, of the three levels of analysis.

Sociologists study different levels of society: the macro level, the meso level, and the micro level. Sociologists define three major levels of society. They use data to understand types of behavior that occur at the different levels and the interconnections of these levels.

IR generally distinguishes between three levels of analysis: the system, the state, and the individual – but the group level is also important to consider as a fourth.

Which level of analysis is the primary focus of this case? Individual level of analysis and organizational level of analysis is the primary focus of the Job 5.

Mesosociology is the study of intermediate (meso) social forces and stratification such as income, age, gender, race, ethnicity, organizations and geographically circumscribed communities.

There are four imperative levels of analysis in international relations theory; systemic- level, all-level, state-level, and sub-state-level. research to encompass the major assumptions at each level of analysis, and major proponents of each theory, beginning with the systemic-level theory.

THE LEVEL OF ANALYSIS PROBLEM DESCRIBED The problem of using aggregate data in statistical analyses. In inter- national studies, investigators often test hypotheses that refer to the behavior of individual actors by using data that have been aggregated over time periods, regions, or some other dimension.

The three most common levels of analysis are:

• Individual (explains war as a result of characteristics)
• State/domestic (focuses on characteristics of states)
• International system (incorporates all of those explanations of war that lie in characteristics of the international system as a whole.

What limits the influence of public opinion on foreign policy? Often the public does not express one dominant mood on foreign policy. In democracies, voters never take foreign policy into account when choosing a candidate. In dictatorships, leaders do not depend on public opinion so they ignore it.

Levels of analysis provide a framework for categorizing the influences and suggesting various explanations of international events.

The four propositions of realism are as follows.

• States are the most important actors.
• The international system is anarchic.
• All states within the system are unitary, rational actors.
• The primary concern of all states is survival.

What is the primary goal of actors in realism? Power. If two states tend to be more cooperative with each other due to their democratic institutions while more hostile to non-democratic peers, then the theoretical construct that best understand this phenomenon is: liberalism.

Is realism anything more than the ideology of powerful satisfied states? No, realist claim that in the condition of anarchy, states will compete with each other for power and security. The tendency of business, technologies , or philosophies to spread throughout the world.

Classical Realism is based on the following assumptions:

• People are by nature narrowly selfish and ethically flawed, and cannot free themselves from the sinful fact that they are born to watch out for themselves.
• Of all people’s evil ways, none are more prevalent, inexorable, or dangerous than their instinctive lust for power and their desire to dominate others.

[4] Whilst it is undoubtedly still able to explain some important international events, structural realism is not able to explain all, or even the majority. Conversely, by virtue of considering a wider range of factors, classical realism can explain many contemporary events.

Classical realism Realism as a self-conscious movement in the study of international relations emerged during the mid-20th century and was inspired by the British political scientist and historian E.H. Carr.

Principles of Classical Realism include: (1) State actions and decisions are rooted in human nature; (2) how the anarchical nature or ‘State of Nature’ of international politics with no central authority influences the decisions and actions of states; (3) the struggle for power or ‘concept of power’ in an anarchical …

Hans Morgenthau

The most significant difference is between classical realism, which places emphasis on human and domestic factors, and neorealism, which emphasizes how the structure of the international system determines state behavior. Neoclassical realism attempts something of a synthesis of the two positions.