Social justice promotes fairness and equity across many aspects of society. For example, it promotes equal economic, educational and workplace opportunities. It’s also important to the safety and security of individuals and communities.

12 steps to achieve gender equality in our lifetimes

1. Talk to women and girls.
2. Let girls use mobile phones.
3. Stop child marriage and sexual harassment.
4. Make education gender sensitive.
5. Raise aspirations of girls and their parents.
6. Empower mothers.
7. Give proper value to ‘women’s work’
8. Get women into power.

Productivity – people who are treated fairly and have equal opportunity are better able to contribute socially and economically to the community, and to enhance growth and prosperity. Confidence – an equal and fair society is likely to be safer by reducing entrenched social and economic disadvantage.

Social Work for Social Justice: Ten Principles

• Human Dignity.
• Dignity of Work and the Rights of Workers.
• Community and the Common Good.
• Solidarity.
• Rights and Responsibilities.
• Stewardship.
• Priority for the Poor and Vulnerable.
• Governance/Principle of Subsidiarity.

Even though the meaning of social justice varies, at least three common elements can be identified in the contemporary theories about it: a duty of the State to distribute certain vital means (such as economic, social, and cultural rights), the protection of human dignity, and affirmative actions to promote equal …

The five main principles of social justice include access to resources, equity, participation, diversity, and human rights.

Social Justice is all about working towards a more equal society. Part of this is ensuring that people are treated with dignity and respect by those with public power, also the main goal of human rights. Human rights are set out in law and they set the rules on how the state should treat individuals.

The three types of justice are distributive, procedural, and interactional.

An example of justice is someone being set free from prison after dna evidence shows they are innocent. Justice includes the notion of upholding the law, as in the work of police, judges and the court. Many philosophers, theologians, sociologists and others define justice as the proper ordering of people and things.

Justice is about right relation to others as measured against the mores of society, while morality is about right relation to right itself, as measured against your own beliefs. The particulars, and the process of discovering and remedying injustice differ in each society, but the basic tenets are the same.

In English law, natural justice is technical terminology for the rule against bias (nemo iudex in causa sua) and the right to a fair hearing (audi alteram partem). The mere fact that a decision affects rights or interests is sufficient to subject the decision to the procedures required by natural justice.

Essentially, natural justice requires that a person receive a fair and unbiased hearing before a decision is made that will negatively affect them. The three main requirements of natural justice that must be met in every case are: adequate notice, fair hearing and no bias.

Exceptions to principles of natural justice: Statutory Exclusion: If it is especially mentioned in the provisions then this proinciple may not be followed. Emergency: When there is emergency, then chance of fair hearing may not be given but afterwards it must be followed when emergency is over.

Natural justice aims to ensure decision-making is fair (procedural fairness) and the resulting decision is reasonable because it is based on rules of evidence that are appropriate to the circumstances. the rule against bias – the decision-maker not having a personal interest in the outcome; and additionally.

Natural justice is a common law doctrine that provides important procedural rights in administrative decision-making. The doctrine now has a wide application and is presumed by the courts to apply to the exercise of virtually all statutory powers.

The principles of natural justice concern the general manner in which a decision is made. Essentially, procedural fairness does not concern the correctness of the decision. Rather, principles of natural justice help to ensure that the decision maker followed the proper procedure in arriving at their decision.

The accepted notion of natural justice in this country is that everyone is entitled to a decision by a disinterested and unbiased adjudicator (nemo judex in causa sua or in English, the hearing rule); and that the parties shall be given adequate notice of the case against them, and a right to respond (audi alteram …

The hearing rule requires a decision maker to afford a person an opportunity to be heard before making a decision affecting their interests. Prior notice that a decision that may affect a person’s interests will be made. This has been referred to as a ‘fundamental’ or ‘cardinal’ aspect of procedural fairness.

There are mainly two Principles of Natural Justice. These two Principles are: ‘Nemo judex in causa sua’. No one should be made a judge in his own cause and the rule against bias.