Corroborating evidence is evidence that strengthens or confirms already existing evidence. In courts, it is used to support the testimony of a witness.

To help students better understand an historical event or issue, it is important to teach them how to corroborate their evidence by comparing the perspectives, argument, claims, and evidence across multiple sources on the same topic.

Corroboration in History Historians corroborate texts multiple times and use different documents when synthesizing sources as historical evidence. That is, if the evidence or claim found in one source can be corroborated by at least two other sources, then it can be accepted as valid.

The definition of corroborate is to take an action to make something more certain. An example of corroborate is to provide details that explain what happened at a crime scene. Evidence to corroborate his testimony.

In a court of law, corroborating evidence is used to uphold the testimony of witnesses. If you swear before a judge that you saw a suspect in front of a convenience store at a certain time, the store’s security video might be corroborating evidence for your testimony.

Strong evidence is accurate, convincing, and relevant to the argument at hand. It comes from a credible source, and it truly supports the reason it is supposed to prove.

Evidence is the facts, examples, or sources used to support a claim. It is also very important to remember that to use evidence effectively means to incorporate it well and to analyse it in a way that makes its connection to your argument clear and logical.

Examples of real evidence include fingerprints, blood samples, DNA, a knife, a gun, and other physical objects. Real evidence is usually admitted because it tends to prove or disprove an issue of fact in a trial.

• State an observation and connect that observation to your opinion. Interviews.
• Use quotes or information from an interview to prove your point. Surveys/Data.
• Use data from a survey to prove your point. Experiments.

Citing textual evidence requires students to look back into the text for evidence to support an idea, answer a question or make a claim. Citing evidence requires students to think more deeply about the text, analyze the author, source etc. Students also need to practice finding strong evidence to support their ideas.

1. You may incorporate textual evidence right into the sentence with the use of quotation marks, but your quote from the text must make sense in the context of the sentence. For example: April is so wildly confused that she actually “…hated Caroline because it was all her fault” (page 118).

Citing or documenting the sources used in your research serves three purposes: It gives proper credit to the authors of the words or ideas that you incorporated into your paper. It allows those who are reading your work to locate your sources, in order to learn more about the ideas that you include in your paper.

Textual evidence deals with facts in writing and the strategies used to figure out whether or not the information is factual. Textual evidence comes into play when an author presents a position or thesis and uses evidence to support the claims. That evidence can come in a number of different forms.