unkind. Synonyms: adverse, alienated, antagonistic, bellicose, belligerent, cold, contentious, disaffected, distant, estranged, frigid, hostile, ill-disposed, indifferent, inimical, unfriendly, warlike.

gentle. Antonyms: rough, rude, coarse, fierce, savage. Synonyms: courteous, polite, highbred, mild, bland, tame, docile, amiable, meek, soft, placid, tender.

unkind. Antonyms: accessible, affable, affectionate, amicable, brotherly, companionable, complaisant, cordial, favorable, fond, friendly, genial, hearty, kind, kindly, loving, neighborly, sociable, social, tender, well-disposed.

Harsh adjective – Difficult to endure. Gentle is an antonym for harsh in topics: hard, rough, nasty.

What is another word for unkind?

Some common synonyms of weak are decrepit, feeble, fragile, frail, and infirm.

: a person who agrees with everything that is said especially : one who endorses or supports without criticism every opinion or proposal of an associate or superior.

Ways of expressing agreement:

1. That’s right/You’re right/I know: used when agreeing with someone:
2. Exactly/Absolutely/I couldn’t agree more: used for saying that you completely agree with someone:
3. You can say that again/You’re telling me: a more informal way of saying that you completely agree with someone:

1 aimlessly, at random, confusedly, frantically, indiscriminately, instinctively, madly, purposelessly, wildly. 2 carelessly, heedlessly, impulsively, inconsiderately, passionately, recklessly, regardlessly, senselessly, thoughtlessly, unreasonably, wilfully.

disapproving : a weak or unimportant person who is controlled by a powerful person, organization, etc. : a performer in a show who says and does foolish things that other performers make jokes about. See the full definition for stooge in the English Language Learners Dictionary.

If you refer to someone as a stooge, you are criticizing them because they are used by someone else to do unpleasant or dishonest tasks.

1a : footman sense 2, servant. b : someone who does menial tasks or runs errands for another. 2 : a servile follower : toady.

(psychology) A confederate; a person who is secretly working for the researcher, unknown to the study participant.

Opposite of a person or thing that is the object of ridicule or criticism. culprit. antagonist. perpetrator. attacker.

stooge (n.) 1913, “stage assistant, actor who assists a comedian,” of uncertain origin, perhaps an alteration of student (with the mispronunciation STOO-jent) in sense of “apprentice.” Meaning “lackey, person used for another’s purpose” first recorded 1937.

The videoed safety behaviours experiment aims to show clients in a very practical, experiential way that the methods that they are using to manage their anxiety (self-focused attention, self-evaluation, and ‘safety behaviours’) do NOT result in a better ‘presentation’ to others.

Learning to identify your hot thoughts (upsetting ideas, self-talk and mental images) that contribute to your social anxiety; learning to test these thoughts against real-life evidence; and learning to come up with a constructive attitude about the situation and yourself that is more realistic, helpful and …

a stooge keeps a participant naïve about the nature of the study (e.g. effects of adrenaline) and suggests to a participant how he or she may behave.

A field experiment is where the independent variable (IV) is manipulated and dependent variable (DV) is measured but the experiment is carried out in a setting that is natural to the participant.

An experiment that Stanley Milgram designed to see what people would do when forced between obeying authority and listening to their conscience and morals. They were told that the experiment was about the effects of punishment of learning.

Milgram used a bias sample of 40 male volunteers, which means we are unable to generalise the results to other populations, in particular females, and cannot conclude if female participants would respond in a similar way.

The ethical issues involved with the Milgram experiment are as follows: deception, protection of participants involved, and the right to withdrawal. The experiment was deemed unethical, because the participants were led to believe that they were administering shocks to real people.

Social psychologist Stanley Milgram researched the effect of authority on obedience. He concluded people obey either out of fear or out of a desire to appear cooperative–even when acting against their own better judgment and desires.