freedom: how war affects human lives. We think of wars as things that happen between countries. And every war will change people’s lives – it might give them freedom, keep them safe, hurt them or their family and friends, give them more money, give them less money, bring them power, take away their power.

War is a bad thing because it involves deliberately killing or injuring people, and this is a fundamental wrong – an abuse of the victims’ human rights.

A country can benefit from war, by gaining wealth or freedom, increasing in power, and advancing in technology. But the reason why war seems only negative is because there is also destruction where millions of innocent people die, losing their resources and time, and also their money.

War destroys communities and families and often disrupts the development of the social and economic fabric of nations. The effects of war include long-term physical and psychological harm to children and adults, as well as reduction in material and human capital.

War subverts democracy and promotes tyranny and fanaticism; kills and sickens and impoverishes people; ravages nature. War is a keystone problem, the eradication of which would make our other social problems much more tractable. Second, war is more readily solvable than many other human afflictions.

War Is No Solution to Any Problem War is the barbaric activity which only concludes in the loss of life and property. Form this we can understand that war is no solution to any problem it only ends in loss of both the parties’ hence peaceful negotiation should be preferred.

Putting aside the very real human cost, war has also serious economic costs – loss of buildings, infrastructure, a decline in the working population, uncertainty, rise in debt and disruption to normal economic activity.

Contemporary theories of the causes of war divide roughly into two major schools. One attributes war to certain innate biological and psychological factors or drives, the other attributes it to certain social relations and institutions. Both schools include optimists and pessimists concerning the preventability of war.

Three pure types of war are distinguished, viz., absolute war, instrumental war, and agonistic fighting.

Ideological change is both the most common cause of conflict and the root of most wars, but there is rarely only one cause of dispute. Congo’s ongoing conflict encompasses a battle for its mineral resources and, according to some, an invasion by another state, Rwanda.

The usual strategies suggested by political scientists and international relations experts to prevent war include arms control and diplomacy. Approaches to arms control and diplomacy vary in their actual and potential effectiveness.

Answer: effects of war also include mass destruction of cities and have long lasting effects on a countrys economy . armed conflict has important indirect negative consequences on infrastructure ,public health provision , and social order . These indirect consequences are often overlooked and unappreciated.

Why do political actions often lead to war? War is often the result of the failure of politics. War can be the result of failure of internal politics. When leaders can’t meet their overblown promises they will often resort to blaming somebody else.

Military activity has significant impacts on the environment. Not only can war be destructive to the socioenvironment, but military activities produce extensive amounts of greenhouse gases (that contribute to anthropogenic climate change), pollution, and cause resource depletion, among other environmental impacts.

The major impact of technology on World War I was that it made the war much more difficult for the infantry soldiers who did most of the fighting. The new technologies led to trench warfare and the lack of new tactics led to massive slaughter at the hands of the new technology.

Europe was thus dominated by two power blocs, the Triple Entente: France, Russia and Britain, and the Triple Alliance: Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy.

Who won World War I? The Allies won World War I after four years of combat and the deaths of some 8.5 million soldiers as a result of battle wounds or disease. Read more about the Treaty of Versailles. In many ways, the peace treaty that ended World War I set the stage for World War II.

The loss of life was greater than in any previous war in history, in part because militaries were using new technologies, including tanks, airplanes, submarines, machine guns, modern artillery, flamethrowers, and poison gas.

New Weapons

• Artillery – Large guns, called artillery, were improved during World War I including anti-aircraft guns to shoot down enemy planes.
• Machine gun – The machine gun was improved during the war.

Artillery

The casualties suffered by the participants in World War I dwarfed those of previous wars: some 8,500,000 soldiers died as a result of wounds and/or disease. The greatest number of casualties and wounds were inflicted by artillery, followed by small arms, and then by poison gas.

Artillery Artillery

7 Deadliest Weapons in History

• Maxim machine gun. World War I: German infantrymen.
• Nuclear weapon. first thermonuclear weapon.
• Shock cavalry.
• Greek fire/napalm.
• Rifle.
• Submarine.
• Biological weapons.

The AN602, also known as the Tsar Bomba (Russian: Царь-бо́мба), (code name Ivan or Vanya, as well as (erroneously) RDS-202 and RN202), was a hydrogen aerial bomb and is the most powerful nuclear weapon ever created and tested….

Here is a list of the 10 deadliest weapons of World War II:

• The Mk 2 Grenade.
• Avro Lancaster Bomber.
• The M1 Garand Rifle.
• The T-34 Tank.
• The MG 42.
• Katyusha Rocket Launcher.
• Hawker Hurricane.
• Atom Bomb (Fat Man and Little Boy)