Senatorial courtesy allows a senator of the president’s political party to veto a judicial appointment in his or her own state.

The practice of “senatorial courtesy, ” i.e., not voting to confirm a nominee to which a senator from the same state objects (especially a senator of the president’s party), has existed since the government’s founding, providing a check on the president’s discretion to choose district judges in particular.

Senatorial courtesy is a long-standing unwritten, unofficial, and nonbinding political custom (or constitutional convention) in the United States describing the tendency of U.S. senators to support a Senate colleague when opposing the appointment to federal office of a nominee from that Senator’s state.

The custom known as “senatorial courtesy,” whereby certain nominations to federal office have been objected to by an individual senator on the ground that the person nominated is not acceptable to him, appears recently to have been limited to local offices of the federal government.

Senatorial Courtesy. An unwritten traditions whereby nominations for state-level federal judicial posts are not confirmed if they are opposed by a senator from the state in which the nominee will serve. The tradition also applies to courts of appeal when there is opposition from the nominee’s state senator.

The Constitution places the power to determine the number of Justices in the hands of Congress. The first Judiciary Act, passed in 1789, set the number of Justices at six, one Chief Justice and five Associates.

Because it amounts to a legislative veto on presidential actions. Why has the custom of senatorial courtesy been criticized? Because it is difficult for Congress to obtain the two-thirds vote necessary to override a presidential veto.

Why has the practice of senatorial courtesy been criticized. Because it is the equivalent of reversing constitutional powers. All of the following make it difficult to get a case to the Supreme Court EXCEPT. The government does not supply lawyers for the appeals court process.

The Tenth Amendment declares, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.” In other words, states have all powers not granted to the federal government by the Constitution.

the Tenth Amendment, which grants states reserved powers. powers granted to the national government in Article I, the founders also included a list of powers that are denied to the states.

10th amendment-states the Constitution’s principle of federalism by providing that powers not granted to the federal government nor prohibited to the states by the Constitution are reserved, respectively, to the states or the people. The 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution is a guarantee of States’ rights.

Undoubtedly the biggest event in the growth of the federal government was the Civil War, which established its supremacy over the states. The Civil War brought much new power to the federal government, and laid the groundwork for the growth of interest groups.

The Constitution gave the national government enumerated powers and, as written in the Tenth Amendment all other powers to the State government. The Constitution does not give local government independent authority; instead they derive their power from the state government.

States and the federal government have both exclusive powers and concurrent powers. There is an ongoing negotiation over the balance of power between the two levels.