He condemns America for being untrue to its founding principles, its past, and its present. The audience must fulfill what the founders of the country advocated. To the slave, Douglass tells the audience, “your 4th of July is a sham; your boasted liberty, an unholy license [for enslaving blacks] . . .
Q. Why is it important for Douglass to tell his listeners that he does not despair of this country?
Why is it important for Douglass to tell his listeners that he does “not despair of this country”? Even though he has just delivered a dark and stinging denunciation of the country, he does not want his listeners to leave the hall feeling depressed and hopeless. 30.
Table of Contents
- Q. Why is it important for Douglass to tell his listeners that he does not despair of this country?
- Q. What did Frederick Douglass say in his speech?
- Q. What is Douglass speech about and how does he feel about it?
- Q. What change are the plaintiffs in this case seeking quizlet?
- Q. What change were the plaintiffs in this case seeking?
- Q. What is the author’s purpose for including this sentence?
- Q. What are the plaintiffs seeking for?
- Q. Which best describes a good soldier?
- Q. Which best explains why Baldwin chooses to describe the results?
- Q. What are the plaintiffs for their children in Brown v Board of Education?
- Q. Why is Brown vs Board of Education important today?
Q. What did Frederick Douglass say in his speech?
“The rich inheritance of justice, liberty, prosperity and independence, bequeathed by your fathers, is shared by you, not by me. The sunlight that brought life and healing to you, has brought stripes and death to me. This Fourth [of] July is yours, not mine.”
Q. What is Douglass speech about and how does he feel about it?
Fredrick Douglas speech “What to the slave is the fourth of July?” he praises and respects the founding fathers. He agrees with how they included “life, liberty and the pursue of happiness” in the declaration of independence.
Q. What change are the plaintiffs in this case seeking quizlet?
1. What change are the plaintiffs in this case seeking? The plaintiffs are seeking the aid of the courts in obtaining admission to public schools on a nonsegregated basis.
Q. What change were the plaintiffs in this case seeking?
What change are the plaintiffs in this case seeking? The plaintiffs are seeking the aid of the courts in obtaining admission to public schools on a non segregated basis.
Q. What is the author’s purpose for including this sentence?
What is the author’s purpose for including this sentence? Answer: The author’s purpose for including this sentence is: A. to condemn the insincerity of his critics’ advice .
Q. What are the plaintiffs seeking for?
A plaintiff (Π in legal shorthand) is the party who initiates a lawsuit (also known as an action) before a court. By doing so, the plaintiff seeks a legal remedy. If this search is successful, the court will issue judgment in favor of the plaintiff and make the appropriate court order (e.g., an order for damages).
Q. Which best describes a good soldier?
The answer is option B (a soldier who is always vigilant). Explanation: Among his concepts, Herr argues that a good soldier is the one who is always vigilant to stay alive.
Q. Which best explains why Baldwin chooses to describe the results?
Answer: Baldwin uses the word “spoils” to imply that racial prejudice has resulted in ruining the day of his father’s funeral. The best explanation for Baldwin choosing to describe the results of the race riot in Harlem with the word “spoils” is to imply that racial injustice ruined the day of his father’s funeral.
Q. What are the plaintiffs for their children in Brown v Board of Education?
In 1951, a class action suit was filed against the Board of Education of the City of Topeka, Kansas in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. The plaintiffs were thirteen Topeka parents on behalf of their 20 children.
Q. Why is Brown vs Board of Education important today?
Board of Education had set the legal precedent that would be used to overturn laws enforcing segregation in other public facilities. But despite its undoubted impact, the historic verdict fell short of achieving its primary mission of integrating the nation’s public schools. Today, more than 60 years after Brown v.
