First, they agreed that the United States needed to be democratic. They agreed that the people had to be able to elect the House of Representatives and indirectly, the Senate and the President. They agreed that the states had to have democratic forms of government.

The United States Constitution is silent on the subject of political parties. The Founding Fathers did not originally intend for American politics to be partisan.

The Framers of the Constitution were delegates to the Constitutional Convention and helped draft the Constitution of the United States. The main Founding Fathers were: John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and George Washington.

The Framers thought that this was necessary because they wanted to avoid having a government or a part of government that was too powerful. The Framers were still worried about the idea of a part of government taking too much power. They were afraid the executive might become a monarch.

Why did the Framers want to establish a limited government? To prevent the government from gaining too much power, as they felt Britain had. The Articles of Confederation gave these powers to the states and this proved to be a weakness of this government.

Evidently, the framers were afraid that too strong a central government would easily bring about autocracy. In order to restrict the authority of the central government, the framers wanted to make it clear in the Constitution that certain powers were emphatically denied to the Federal Government.

Explanation: In the Constitution, the Founding Fathers laid the framework of the new government. Defining the powers each branch of the government had. This was created to ensure no one branch of the government became too powerful thus preventing the possibility of a tyrannical government from appearing again.

The executive branch carries out the laws. Analyzing Why did the Framers give different duties to each branch? The framers gave different duties to each branch so no branch had too many responsibilities and no branch had too much power. The purposes or the laws congress passes is to make the nation stronger.

It consists of the president, the vice president, the cabinet, and other federal agencies. In some aspects of government, the Executive Branch is stronger than the other two branches. He has the power to appoint judges and nominate heads of federal agencies. He also has the authority to veto laws that Congress passes.

The congress may have more members but in the end, their numbers make it very hard for everyone to agree. The president can make decisions more freely. This makes the presidential powers easier to use and ultimately means that the executive branch is stronger than the legislative branch.

Congress

In conclusion, The Legislative Branch is the most powerful branch of the United States government not only because of the powers given to them by the Constitution, but also the implied powers that Congress has. There is also Congress’s ability to triumph over the Checks and balances that limits their power.

The judicial branch—even though it has the power to interpret laws—is considered the weakest of the three branches by many because it cannot ensure that its decisions are enforced. However, federal judges have great power due in part to their longevity. Federal judges receive life appointments under the Constitution.

78, Hamilton said that the Judiciary branch of the proposed government would be the weakest of the three branches because it had “no influence over either the sword or the purse, It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment.” Federalist No.

The judicial branch is considered the weakest branch because it cannot act unless it is called for by a case. The courts do not have power in the government. On the other hand, the executive and legislative branch can be active and make decisions that impact the nation’s policies.

Judicial branch may check both the legislative and executive by declaring laws unconstitutional. Obviously, this is not the whole system, but it is the main idea. Other checks and balances include:. Executive over the judicial branch.

special courts- only hear cases in a very narrow jurisdiction and the judges serve for a specific term, while constitutional court’s main authority is to rule on whether laws that are challenged are in fact unconstitutional, Example- whether they conflict with constitutionally established rights and freedoms.

Orderly and lawful action; conduct that is deemed proper for a peaceful and law-abiding individual. The Constitution of the United States provides that federal judges shall hold their offices during good behavior, which means that they cannot be discharged but can be impeached for misconduct. …

In other words, the Good Behavior Clause simply indicates that judges are not appointed to their seats for set terms and cannot be removed at will; removing a federal judge requires impeachment and conviction for a high crime or misdemeanor.

The Founding Fathers considered the US Supreme Court to be the weakest of the three branches of government since, as Alexander Hamilton noted, it held “neither sword nor purse strings.” The longest serving current justice is Clarence Thomas, who has been on the Court since 1991.

70 argues in favor of the unitary executive created by Article II of the United States Constitution. According to Alexander Hamilton, a unitary executive is necessary to: ensure accountability in government. enable the president to defend against legislative encroachments on his power.

A weak executive creates a bad government because the national government cannot enforce its power, makes the country less unified due to state powers, creates an executive branch not having the ability to contain state powers.

How do human weaknesses complicate decision-making, according to Hamilton? They lessen the respectability, weaken the authority, and distract the plans and operations of those whom they divide. They lessen the respectability, weaken the authority, and distract the plans and operations of those whom they divide.

Why do these characteristics provide evidence for a unified executive! The legislative branch includes discussing/arguing/passing/settling laws and past disputes. They regularly exercise their powers through the Supreme Court and lower courts to show their agreements and the people’s opinions as a whole.

Why is disagreement within the legislative branch beneficial, while in the executive branch it is detrimental? Disagreement is within the legislative branch beneficial, because congress is arguing about something, two sides want their side to win and they represent two sides of the population.

Disagreement in the executive branch however is not beneficial because it can cause delays in administering laws or signing them into the official lawbook, or it can cause for people who did something bad to answer for it at a later time which gives them time to escape, or anything similar.

Federalists favored a strong central government, as opposed to the Anti-Federalists, who supported a weak central government and emphasized the role of state authority. The Articles of Confederation provided the first government for the newly independent United States.

The 85 essays succeeded by helping to persuade doubtful New Yorkers to ratify the Constitution. Today, The Federalist Papers helps us to more clearly understand what the writers of the Constitution had in mind when they drafted that amazing document 200 years ago.