Writing out ideas, researching support, and writing a draft – are the three best ways to generate ideas for a writing project.

Search for: When generating ideas for a research project you should Weegy?

Search for: When choosing a topic for your writing project you should consider?

A good expert witness report should be clear and precise about the opinions and conclusions of the expert, as well as the basis for each conclusion reached by the writer in the report.

The best thing you can do when learning a new skill is ask an expert….

1. Step 1: Find out who you want to learn from. When you want expert advice, you have to find the experts.
2. Step 2: Invite them out to coffee (or Skype meeting)
3. Step 3: Ask incredibly specific questions.

A lack of corroboration indicates that: no other source present the same information or point of view.

Admissible. This is the most basic rule and a measure of evidence validity and importance. The evidence must be preserved and gathered in such a way that it can be used in court or elsewhere. Many errors can be made that could cause a judge to rule a piece of evidence as inadmissible.

Corroborating evidence (or corroboration) is evidence that tends to support a proposition that is already supported by some initial evidence, therefore confirming the proposition. For example, W, a witness, testifies that she saw X drive his automobile into a green car.

In a court of law, a judge or jury who believes that a witness is telling the truth can convict someone of a crime even without corroborating evidence. The notion that, when a witness has testified credibly, some special “corroborating evidence” is still needed in order to make a proper decision is simply incorrect.

To be admissible in court, the evidence must be relevant (i.e., material and having probative value) and not outweighed by countervailing considerations (e.g., the evidence is unfairly prejudicial, confusing, a waste of time, privileged, or based on hearsay).

Can those comments be used in court? Whether it’s Facebook posts and comments, Instagram pictures, Twitter tweets or YouTube videos, the short answer is yes: both public and private social media content can be admissible in litigation.

Text message conversations must contain relevant, admissible evidence and you must take steps to properly preserve the authenticity of the text messages or else you may not be able to use them as evidence. Like most pieces of evidence, text messages are not automatically admissible in court.

The answer to that is yes. They can be used to ‘back up’ anything you are trying to prove. So in non molestation order proceedings (i.e injunctions) they can be used to prove that someone has been abusive or threatening or to disprove such allegations.