Generally, the lower the p-value, the more likely your data is to be statistically significant, as a lower p-value makes it more and more implausible that the null hypothesis could have explained the results. In most fields, a value of 0.0001 would be statistically significant.
Q. What if the null hypothesis is rejected?
In null hypothesis testing, this criterion is called α (alpha) and is almost always set to . 05. If there is less than a 5% chance of a result as extreme as the sample result if the null hypothesis were true, then the null hypothesis is rejected. When this happens, the result is said to be statistically significant .
Table of Contents
Q. How is Alpha related to the likelihood of rejecting the null hypothesis?
What Is the Significance Level (Alpha)? The significance level, also denoted as alpha or α, is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true. For example, a significance level of 0.05 indicates a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is no actual difference.
Q. How can Alpha risk be reduced?
Alpha risk is an error occurring when a null hypothesis is rejected when it is actually true. It is also known as “producer risk.” The best way to decrease alpha risk is to increase the size of the sample being tested with the hope that the larger sample will be more representative of the population.
Q. What does P-value 0.001 mean?
p=0.001 means that the chances are only 1 in a thousand. The choice of significance level at which you reject null hypothesis is arbitrary. Conventionally, 5%, 1% and 0.1% levels are used. Conventionally, p < 0.05 is referred as statistically significant and p < 0.001 as statistically highly significant.
Q. Why the P value culture is bad?
A consequence of the dominant P-value culture is that confidence intervals are often not appreciated by themselves, but the information they convey are transformed into simplistic terms of statistical significance. For example, it is common to check if the confidence intervals of two mean values overlap.
Q. Can we trust P value?
More worryingly, there’s evidence it’s widely misused, even in top journals. Most researchers don’t appreciate that p is highly unreliable. Repeat your experiment and you’ll get a p value that could be extremely different. Even more surprisingly, p is highly unreliable even for very large samples.
Q. Why is p value useful?
Since the introduction of P value in 1900 by Pearson [1], the P values are the preferred method to summarize the results of medical articles. Because the P value is the outcome of a statistical test, many authors and readers consider it the most important summary of the statistical analyses.
